She said to me that questions like that, that are so subjective will never be easy to answer due to everyone's differing interpretations. She then gave me a great example of this. She said:
"You could fill a classroom with people and give them coloured pencils and paper, you could then give them instructions of what to draw on that paper eg. draw a square in the top corner, draw a triangle overlapping the square etc. You can almost guarantee that no drawing will be the same."
"You could fill a classroom with people and give them coloured pencils and paper, you could then give them instructions of what to draw on that paper eg. draw a square in the top corner, draw a triangle overlapping the square etc. You can almost guarantee that no drawing will be the same."
Don't all of these pictures have a square in the top corner with a triangle overlapping? But they aren't all the same. Even though the full room could be given the same set of instructions, everyone interpretates them differently. Much in the same way that people have different opinions of what a book is, or what art is, or what an artist's book is. I think that even if there was a precise definition for what any of these are, people would still find holes and see things differently all based on how they interperate it.
No comments:
Post a Comment